![]() His second wish was to transform her again into a swan even thought she didn’t liked the idea, but at the same time she was grateful. He tried to do everything to animate her, but it was useless, because he discovered that the king, the one who granted the three wishes, had transformed a swan into a beautiful woman to make her his wife. Peters noticed through the entire story that his wife wasn’t happy, she did everything a wife had to do, but she simply was not happy. He received a check marking two hundred pounds it was remuneration for his son’s death.Īfter the second wished they both made, both of them had different endings. ![]() White from “The Monkey’s Paw” is the one who was thinking about his first wish in a way he didn’t cared that much, because he knew that everything he wanted was near him, his family, but he had curiosity, “I wished for two hundred pounds.” that was his first wish and he was expecting an instantly reward, but it didn’t come till the next day. After waiting a little he saw how a beautiful woman approached him and after some questions he discovered she was his wife and after some days they got married. Peters, rom the first book is the one who thought more about his wish “I wish I had a wife as beautiful as the forest”, he asked for this because he felt lonely. He explained the family that it would grant three wishes to three men, the first one’s last wish was to die, the second man was him, Morris, and he wouldn’t talk about it, he told the to be careful.īoth main characters made acceptable first wishes, but Mr. White has curiosity about what Sergeant-major Morris had, “I should like to see those old temples and fakirs and jugglers”, even thought Morris didn’t wanted to show them the Monkey’s Paw, each member of the family had curiosity so he couldn’t avoid showing it to them. “I expect three wishes, no more and no less”, the green man criticized how humans never used the wishes with intelligence, but accepted the offer. The green man started to thank the man for saving him the magical creature offered him a reward for his action. Peters saves a swan that was trapped in thorns growing on the bank of a canal, after he assured everything was right with the swan he was leaving, but he turned around and saw a little man with green clothes, a golden crown and long beard, he was astonished. Both stories have differences and similarities that can lead to a great ending. “The Third Wish” is a modern day fables, meanwhile the second one is a horror story. Jacobs are short stories based on a man that can ask for three wishes. Different pharmacological agents have been tested, but the use of iso-osmolar or hypo-osmolar contrast agents along with continuous hydration before, during, and after the intervention are the only methods that have currently achieved adequate nephroprotection.“The Third Wish” a by Joan Aiken and “The Monkey’s Paw” by W. As there is no specific treatment available for this condition, emphasis should be placed on prevention. It is the third leading cause of in-hospital acute kidney injuries, and it leads to an increase in morbidity and mortality of the population. Contrast-induced nephropathy is defined as an absolute (≥ 0.5 mg/dL) or relative increase (≥ 25%) of the serum creatinine within 24-72 hours post-exposure to the contrast media. It is estimated that the incidence is about 0-5% among the population with normal renal function however it can reach 12-27% among people with altered baseline renal function. The use of contrast media in the diagnostic and therapeutic medical arsenal can cause adverse effects, such as renal toxicity and acute kidney injury, known as contrast-induced nephropathy. Se han probado distintos agentes farmacológicos, sin embargo, hoy en día los únicos métodos que han logrado asegurar adecuada nefroprotección son el uso de agentes de contraste isoosmolares o de baja osmolaridad junto con hidratación continua del paciente antes, durante y después de la intervención. Por tanto, el énfasis se realiza en la prevención. No se dispone de un tratamiento específico para esta entidad. Es la tercera causa de injuria renal aguda intrahospitalaria y conlleva un aumento en la morbimortalidad de la población. La nefropatía inducida por contraste se define como un aumento absoluto (≥ 0,5 mg/dl) o relativo (≥ 25%) de la creatinina sérica en 24-72 h postexposición al medio de contraste. Se estima que en la población con función renal normal la incidencia es del 0-5% sin embargo, en personas con alteración de la función renal basal puede llegar a un 12-27%. ![]() El uso de medios de contraste dentro del arsenal diagnóstico y terapéutico médico puede ocasionar efectos adversos como toxicidad renal e injuria renal aguda, conocida como nefropatía inducida por contraste.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |